A new tool to help Lehigh County prepare annual budgets was presented to county commissioners and administrators Monday evening inside the county government center in Allentown.
An analysis by the Colorado-based Center for Priority Based Budgeting – PBB -- has determined that 228 programs offered by the county, at an annual cost of $22.5 million, are the least relevant, based on several factors.
That’s 228 out of a total of 1,226 programs, for which the county is paying a total of more than $340 million this year.
Specific low priority programs were not revealed during the priority-based budgeting presentation by Chris Fabian, co-founder of the consulting firm, but will be made available in “a day or so” to county commissioners, who soon will begin wrestling with the 2015 budget.
County executive Thomas Muller said the priority-based budgeting report presented by Fabian can be used by commissioners in determining 2015 funding priorities. He plans to release the proposed 2015 budget during a news conference at 2 p.m. Aug. 28.
Seven of the nine county commissioners attended the PBB presentation.
The consultant, which is being paid about $45,000 for the study, has given the county an independent and objective guide that can be used to help determine budget priorities.
“What we’ve brought to the party is essentially the state-of-the art method for diving into the budget and the determining the objectives we want to hit,” said Muller.
A couple of commissioners expressed skepticism about the validity of some basic county objectives around which PBB determined priorities.
The consultant ranked all programs offered by the county into four different “quartiles.”
Most of the county’s budget is spent on programs that were ranked the highest, according to figures provided by Fabian:
• In the top ranking are 318 programs, which cost a total of $206.5 million.
• In the second quartile are 329 programs costing $57 million.
• In the third are 391 programs costing $54.6 million.
• And, in the lowest quartile are 228 programs costing $22.5 million.
Fabian said programs in that fourth quartile “are the least relevant to the results you want to achieve.”
He added: “It’s not to say these are irrelevant. They’re just less relevant. It’s a relative process. That’s what this whole thing is about.”
Muller said PBB was “quite impressed when they first shook out all the numbers as to how much fell into the top quartile and the second quartile and how little was down in the low quartiles.”
Fabian said the majority of the county’s resources should be in the top two priority areas, but also noted programs in the two lowest rankings should not just all be eliminated.
He explained municipalities that develop a pattern of annually decreasing “resource allocation to lower priority areas in favor of resource allocation to higher priority areas is the mark of progress in priority-based budgeting.”
Muller said the analytical tool developed by PBB for the county “is not designed to numerically get you an answer. It’s really a very strong starting point in the discussion. This is designed to encourage discussion and to focus discussion.”
After the meeting, Lisa Scheller, chairwoman of the commissioners, said the PBB report “is going to be a great tool for us to use to really start digging into the programs -- to see what is important for the county to be doing, and seeing if there are areas we should be putting more focus on as well as areas we should be putting less focus on.”
She said the PBB report “appears to be very thorough” and offers “plenty for us to work with right now. It’s going to take a lot of hours of analysis. But it starts to provide a broad framework for what is important for the county to be doing and how our resources should be allocated.”
Although the PBB study was not yet complete when county department heads submitted their 2015 budget needs to the administration, Muller said they were familiar with the PBB project and believes it helped them as they were preparing those budgets.
“I don’t think it would be fair to say it was used to the optimum this year,” said the executive, adding PBB’s final report will have more value to administrators in developing the 2016 budget.
Fabian also said the information he provided will have value in shaping county budgets in future years. He explained if a county department wants to add a new program, it can be plugged into the model PBB created to determine its value.
County spends less to operate
The consultant said 92.5 percent of the county budget is spent on community-oriented programs offered directly to citizens.